Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:56:16 -0400, Ary Borenszweig > <a...@esperanto.org.ar> wrote: >> foo(timeout=5, bar="100") > It could also be accomplished via a fully implemented reflection > library, which is my side topic for this thread branch :P
No. The names of positional arguments are an implementation detail, and should not be exposed via reflection. Named arguments are different from positional arguments and require separate language support. Consider the ambiguity caused by function overloading: void f(int x, string y); void f(string y, int x); f(x = 1, y = ""); Consider the implications of function pointers: void f(int x, int y); void g(int y, int x); (cond ? &f : &g)(x = 1, y = 2); -- Rainer Deyke - rain...@eldwood.com
