Reply to bearophile,
Walter Bright:
2. make arrays implementable on .net
I don't care of such thing. dotnet already has C# and C# is probably
better than D,
I beg to differ. D is much better than c# in many ways (D's abstraction tools
are WAY better; C#'s end at reflection and generics, both runtime-only) and
not as good in a few others (tools, libs, runtime refection).
and it's similar anyway. So I don't think people will
use D on dotnet.
This I agree with because D looses many if not all of its advantages when
forced into the .NET/CLI/managed-code world
