bearophile wrote:
2. make arrays implementable on .net
I don't care of such thing. dotnet already has C# and C# is probably better
than D, and it's similar anyway. So I don't think people will use D on dotnet.
So even if creating a D for dotnet can be positive, I don't want D2 to change
its design to allow a better implementation on dotnet.
I see two things a dotnet implementation of D could have over native D:
- better garbage collector (the D one barely does its job...)
- better interoperability (*hint* OMF *hint*)
