On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 09:48:32 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 at 09:47:21 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 July 2014 at 20:39:23 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
"has anyone ever tied a real webservice to vibe.d?"
Yes and see no problems with it. Looks like author has very
specific expectations of "webservice" concept and can't do a
thing with 100%
.. coverage of all utilities in the library. Sad he does not
provide some sample of missing bits. Most likely he has
expected vibe.d to be exclusively web framework while it is
generic networking / async framework.
Yeah, connection-based protocols are where UDS really shines for
supporting seamless upgrades. Transaction-based protocols like
HTTP are much easier to deal with in this respect.
