On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 12:51:40PM -0700, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On 7/9/2014 9:08 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote: > >I would, except that I'm unsure of exactly what is needed in said > >design. > > I'm unsure as well. That's why design work is needed! > > >Are we just trying to nail down the exact semantics of 'scope'? > >Or are we looking at implementational issues (possible compiler > >performance hits)? Or both? Or something else altogether? Do we need to > >account for (what little exists of) the current implementation? Speaking > >of which, what *is* the current extent of the implementation of 'scope'? > >I assume it isn't just a no-op, since I see it applied to delegate > >parameters every now and then? > > Yes, yes, yes, ... these are questions that all need investigation and > answering.
Surely the last question doesn't need *investigation* per se?? Or do we really have no idea whatsoever as to what 'scope' currently does in dmdfe at all? T -- Meat: euphemism for dead animal. -- Flora