One thing that bothers me quite a bit is that char's do not have length. This makes it difficult in templates that can take either strings or chars.

While one can write a template that returns the length of a string or char, I would imagine that this could be implemented in the compiler more efficiently?

    char.length always returns 1.

Similarly, it would be nice to be able to use [] on chars.

    char[x] returns char.

Example:

    auto last(T)(T s) { return s[s.length-1]; }

    void main()
    {
        writeln(last("asdf"));
        writeln(last('c'));       // fails!! But surely this should work!
    }



http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/cba5a635d08e

    Error: s must be an array or pointer type, not char
    Error: no property 'length' for type 'char'

Basically, I see no reason why char's can't be more confluent with strings, at least on the surface. I would reduce code bloat/specialization for no real reason.

If the compile knows a type is a char then char.length = 1 and char[x] = char. Shouldn't be hard or cause any problems?

Reply via email to