On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 03:03:12PM +0000, Peter Alexander via Digitalmars-d wrote: > http://pointersgonewild.wordpress.com/2014/07/11/the-constness-problem/ > > I can relate to this. I don't use classes much in D, but I find it > frustrating that you need to reach to std.typecons.Rebindable for what > I would consider to be a more common usage of const with classes. > > I really feel that a mutable reference to a const object should be > expressible in the core language.
+1. This also adversely affects generic code. As soon as you have a const in there, things break. We badly, badly, need tail-const. T -- Let X be the set not defined by this sentence...
