On 7/14/14, 7:11 AM, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 7/12/14, 5:35 PM, Andrew Edwards via Digitalmars-d wrote:
David, I'm sure you are aware that list will never be empty.
Never? Awfully defeatist. There was a point where it was down to just
the one from 2011. And we've had releases where the no new known
regressions policy has been true. That rule should remain in effect.
Defeatist? Hmmmm... You can call me what you want. I'm neither offended
nor does my point of view change because of it.
You can't ask? Bzzzt. You can and most certainly should ask. Change
of emphasis during a release process is appropriate and a little
reminder can help quite a bit. Are there kibitzers that play arm chair
quarterback? Of course, but that shouldn't stop us from doing what we
believe to be the right thing. The woe is me attitude is ridiculous and
certainly not helpful.
I'd just like to draw your attention to your response to item (d) at:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/52d07805.9090...@gmail.com
