On Monday, 14 July 2014 at 15:45:39 UTC, David Gileadi wrote:
On 7/14/14, 5:03 AM, w0rp wrote:
Then I wondered if the "Documentation" section should be
renamed "Language Specifications" and the links renamed to
"DMD 1" and "DMD 2" or if they should be merged into the
sections for DMD 1 and DMD 2 respectively, because 7 year old
DMD 1 specs are now pretty much obsolete? Someone new to the
web site looking for (current) compiler documentation will
only get confused.

That's a good shout. I like the "Language Specifications"
suggestion. I'll make a note to change that later.

When I first reorganized the current site I ended up using "Language Reference" and "Library Reference" for the D-spec and Phobos docs, respectively. There was also a collection of articles which fell under documentation, for lack of a better place to put them, and the Documentation section has grown since.

I don't know where the documentation link should take you, but there are a number of sections under the current Documentation (including not one, not two but three "tutorial" links, each named slightly differently and all of which leave dlang.org). I personally think that "Language Specification" is a bit narrow to cover all those topics.

He was actually referring to the subsection in the Downloads page. I made that same mistake myself until I read what he said a couple of times more and then I got what he was saying. Still I understand what you're saying about what should go in there. For the moment on the master branch it takes you right to the library documentation.

Reply via email to