On 16 July 2014 07:12, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 7/15/2014 9:29 PM, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d wrote: >> >> I don't have any skin in this particular discussion, but it's worth >> pointing out >> here that while it's cute that builtin's can be added, when they're not >> part of >> the language definition, they're not really part of a portable solution. > > > They're as portable as we want them to be.
I read that as, not portable at all then. :o)
