On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 20:45:25 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Sunday, 27 July 2014 at 19:04:09 UTC, Fool wrote:
If a candidate for opCmp does not match the default
equivalence relation == (defined implicitly or explicitly
specified using opEquals) it should not be defined at all.
Does this mean that you agree that opCmp should define a total
order?
I think that it should be documented to require properties of a
strict partial order (irreflexivity and transitivity, and thus
asymmetry) and recommended to model a strict weak order such that
(stable) sorting is defined.
