On Monday, 28 July 2014 at 06:05:03 UTC, Fool wrote:
So D has to separate opEquals and opCmp since otherwise a user could not define floating-point 'equality' and 'comparison' himself in the same way as it is defined by the language.I'm convinced know. :-)
But opCmp does not affect <> and !<>, which is the closest you get to equivalence?
Then again NaN is really bottom, not a proper value, but an exceptional state...
