On 7/30/2014 5:50 PM, Tobias Müller wrote:
Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:On 7/30/2014 3:53 PM, Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d wrote:No, with the assert definition you're proposing, it won't. It would be allowed to optimize away the bounds check. And this is just one of many problems with the assert==assume approach.Please explain how assume would behave any differently.It wouldn't and that's the point.
So we're back to assert and assume being the same thing. Ok.
