On Wednesday, 6 August 2014 at 07:19:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 8/5/14, 11:28 PM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
On Wednesday, 6 August 2014 at 00:52:32 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 8/3/2014 4:51 PM, Mike Farnsworth wrote:
I think "assert" is good to use for optimization, and "debug
assert" would be a good choice for soft assertions. Care must
Conceptually, this means a "release assert" (both in debug and
release builds) and a "debug assert" (only in debug builds).
Thus, question: it is acceptable to optimize a (release) build
based on code that is present only into another (debug) build?