On Thursday, 7 August 2014 at 17:44:02 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d" wrote in message
news:mailman.674.1407424873.16021.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
> And we've also got asserts in pre-conditions, which are
> recoverable by
> definition.
Huh, what? I thought asserts in pre-conditions are
non-recoverable,
because they imply that user code has broken the contract
governing the
use of that function.
I meant asserts in pre-conditions when used with inheritance.
It's a pass if any of the preconditions pass, so the compiler
runs them in turn and catches all but the last.
Oh man, I forgot about this. I wonder how this works from a
codegen perspective. Is precondition inheritance properly
implemented yet?
