On Friday, 8 August 2014 at 14:27:56 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 07:15:22PM +1000, Daniel Murphy via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
"H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d" wrote in message
news:mailman.684.1407434193.16021.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
>Hmph. Now it's making me wonder if preconditions should be
>treated as
>a *single* assert outside the body of 'in{}', rather than
>allowing
>individual asserts inside. Perhaps the body of 'in{}' should
>return a
>boolean where false indicates a failed precondition,
I think that ship has sailed.
I know. It was more of a wish than anything.
T
Since the ship HAS sailed... why must contracts be elided with
--release? Seems to me if asserts go away, then eliding in and
out is redundant. It'd be nice if I could put all my recoverable
pre and post conditions inside those blocks as well. Just for
organization's sake.
