On Saturday, 9 August 2014 at 20:04:13 UTC, Timothee Cour via Digitalmars-d wrote:
See email: 'with(Foo):' not allowed, why? in '
digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com' forum
There's already an implementation proposed.

If this is going to be accepted I will most likely resort to DScanner rule that statically prohibits it, don't like such features. Even "attribute:" syntax can easily result in code obfuscation and should be used with caution - and this one is worse.

Reply via email to