On Sunday, 10 August 2014 at 23:29:17 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Sunday, 10 August 2014 at 23:16:57 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
If this is going to be accepted I will most likely resort to
DScanner rule that statically prohibits it, don't like such
features. Even "attribute:" syntax can easily result in code
obfuscation and should be used with caution - and this one is
worse.
Yeah i guess extra complexity for assisting tools
(auto-completion and the like) need to be considered as well...
I did not mean that extra overhead for tools is a deal breaker -
just that I don't like proposed feature itself strong enough to
resort to external tools to define language subset that prohibits
it, even if it gets accepted upstream.
