I'd also like to see some benchmarks, particularly against some of the high performance C++ parsers, i.e. rapidjson, gason, sajson. Or even some of the "not bad" performance parsers with better APIs, i.e. QJsonDocument, jsoncpp and jsoncons (slow but perhaps comparable interface to this proposal?).
It would be nice to have integers treated separately to doubles.
I know it makes the number parsing simpler to just treat
everything as double, but still, it could be annoying when you
expect an integer type.
- Re: RFC: std.json sucessor via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std.json sucesso... Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std.json suc... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std.jso... Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std... Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std... Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std... Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std.json sucessor Christian Manning via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std.json sucessor Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std.json sucessor via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std.json sucesso... Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std.json suc... via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std.jso... Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std.json suc... Christian Manning via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std.jso... Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std... John Colvin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std... Christian Manning via Digitalmars-d
- Re: RFC: std.json sucessor Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d