On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:20:55 +0200 Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> I agree. Those would be the points with most impacts. However, the
> outcome would be quite far away from standard JSON, so we would
> really be talking about something like ASON or SDL already.
most widely-used json parsers supports that three features anyway, i
believe, so it's almost safe to just add 'em.
yes, we can have other backends -- xml, ason, sdl, anything. but i
can't see any sane reasons to add such backends. they will lead to code
bloating, more testing and will just confuse end-users ("oh, which
backend i should use? why there are so many?").
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
