On 9/9/2014 11:07 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 September 2014 at 03:00:48 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
separate invocations […] and templates probably could still fuck it
all up anyway.
If so, then this is either a critical bug in DMD, or an issue with your
code (e.g. due to version(unittest) use).
I'm aware of the issues that affect some ways of doing incremental
compilation, but that's mostly a different story.
David
I was thinking about something like this:
//a.d
import b.d;
alias x = Foo!whatever;
//b.d
struct Foo(Arg) {
void foo() {...}
unittest { /+...unittest foo()...+/ }
}
// Attempt to exclude module b's unittests, except...aren't
// they compiled when module a's is compiled? The first
// dmd invocation here has no idea module b will be compiled
// without the -unittest flag.
>dmd -c -unittest a.d
>dmd -c b.d // Duplicate a whole buttload of processing here
>dmd a.o b.o
