On Monday, 15 September 2014 at 09:53:28 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
On Monday, 15 September 2014 at 02:26:19 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
The road there is long, but it starts with the proverbial
first step. As it were, I have a rough draft of a
almost-drop-in replacement of string (aka immutable(char)[]).
Destroy with maximum prejudice:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/817283c163f5
I haven't found a single lock, is single threading by design or
is thread-safety on your todo?
There's no use of `shared`, so all data involved is TLS.
