On Saturday, 20 September 2014 at 16:56:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 9/20/14, 8:08 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-09-20 16:33, Paulo Pinto wrote:

It requires compiler support, though.

The first thing I asked in this thread was "Are you suggesting we implement ARC?" and the answer was "Yes" [1]. So it looks like Andrei already wants to implement ARC. My definition of ARC is that the compiler inserts the calls to retain/release (or whatever you call them).

[1]
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/lvhiam$1pno$1...@digitalmars.com#post-lvi0ve:2429il:241:40digitalmars.com

Please don't take me in a court of law. But yes, I am talking about the compiler inserting calls to increment and decrement reference counts. -- Andrei

I suggest the compiler insert calls to whatever "lifetime events" may cause an increment/decrement. Then, the druntime can provide the implementation.

I believe with these runtime hooks in place platform-specific optimizations and even alternative memory managers can be experimented with.

I refer you to an enlightening quote I once found on a raytracing site that really captures the beauty of software: "You know you've been raytracing too long when you've been asked how you did that thing you did by the author of the raytracer you used to do it."

Just build the capability, and let the community surprise you with their ingenuity.

Mike

Reply via email to