On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 04:52:24 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2014 04:40:53 +0000
deadalnix via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
The throw thing is rather stupid, as the scope statement can
call arbitrary function that can itself throw.
that's why you'd better use collectException() there, i
presume. ;-)
btw: shouldn't compiler check and reject code that calls
no-nothrow
functions in scope(...)? bug/ER?
No, just like destructors can throw, scope statements can throw
too. That's why we have exception chaining.
