On Friday, 10 October 2014 at 07:53:05 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 19:37:31 -0700
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>
wrote:
If we're going to break things, it needs to be for something
that
matters. This doesn't make the cut.
ah, again...
people: yes, yes, we WANT it, let's break our code and do it!
Walter: ha, shut up! this doesn't matter at all, we will not
break the
code for this!
people: aaaargh! (--motivation, ++frustration)
i myself don't like this game enough to participate. there is
no sense
in both implementing something and discussing something. small
fixes
will be rejected due to being small, big fixes will be rejected
due to
being big. and medium fixes will be rejected due to being too
big for
small and too small for big. this game has no way to win.
so at least nobody will read any more rants from me about
inconsistencies in D. still a win.
yoooohoooo!
wait.... why are you still posting? gtfo
