On Friday, 31 October 2014 at 19:04:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/27/2014 12:42 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
I'm planning on doing a pull request for druntime which
rewrites every toString
function within druntime to use the new sink signature. That
way druntime would
cause a lot less allocations which end up beeing garbage right
away. Are there
any objections against doing so? Any reasons why such a pull
request would not
get accepted?
Why a sink version instead of an Output Range?
I guess because it's for druntime, and we don't want to pull in
std.range?
