On 1 November 2014 05:06, via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Friday, 31 October 2014 at 19:04:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: >> >> On 10/27/2014 12:42 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote: >>> >>> I'm planning on doing a pull request for druntime which rewrites every >>> toString >>> function within druntime to use the new sink signature. That way druntime >>> would >>> cause a lot less allocations which end up beeing garbage right away. Are >>> there >>> any objections against doing so? Any reasons why such a pull request >>> would not >>> get accepted? >> >> >> Why a sink version instead of an Output Range? > > > I guess because it's for druntime, and we don't want to pull in std.range?
I'd say that I'd be nervous to see druntime chockers full of templates...?
