On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:09:44 +0000 Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 07:18 -0800, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote: > […] > > Yeah, I find in my own experience that gdc -O3 tends to produce code > > that's consistently ~20% faster than dmd -O, especially in > > compute-intensive code. The downside is that gdc usually lags behind dmd > > by one release, which, given the current rate of development in D, can > > be quite a big difference in feature set available. > > GDC is tied to the GCC release program I guess nope. it's just lack of developers. > I am not up to compiling gdc from source, but compiling ldc2 is very > straightforward, to the extent that i can't build git head. ;-)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
