On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:47:29 +0000 John Colvin via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> The attachment feature is useful (and is used) for listing large > test-cases, stack traces etc. It is not an exclusive feature for > patches. i don't ever talked about disabling attaches. but there is no sense to allow attaching *PATCHES*. > What part of http://wiki.dlang.org/Get_involved and related pages > weren't clear to you, such that even after being told about > github being the chosen method you still decided that the > "(proposed patch, testcase, etc.)" text by the issues.dlang.org > "Add an attachment" link superseded it all! that is overall D attitude: "don't look at what we wrote here, look at what we wrote there! sure, you HAVE to go there first, and we will not give you any handly links. and than we'll blame you for using our tools as we wrote in that tools, 'cause you must use that tools as we wrote outside of that tools. and we blame you for don't reading something that is not even linked from inside our tool. and we will not fix it and blame you again, 'cause it's fun and we never fixing 'cosmetic issues' anyway."
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature