On 12/14/14 4:41 AM, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote:
there is preapproved bounty ER in bugzilla:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11070

i did that, where is my bounty?!

but talking seriously, i don't need any bounty, i just want somebody to
take a look at that and either tell me what to fix or integrate it in
mainline. along with this one: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13526

they are small, but nice additions. i'm using that patches on dayly
basis and didn't found any troubles with them. please, take those, so i
can throw away two .patch files from my build directory! ;-)

It's already been said, and by me before this, use github. If you don't you have relegated yourself to this existence you so despise.

As a practical matter, I see emails for every message posted on github. I may not respond to all of them due to my limited time, but I do look at ones that pertain to my area in the runtime/phobos. I can see the patch online, without having to download it, apply it and test it. I can add comments to specific lines. The auto tester tests it. Only github PRs will be accepted into mainline, not patches on bugzilla, because of the auto tester. This means that your patch must be turned into a PR, and then whoever turns it in must support it if it needs fixing. A previous incarnation of this "development process" did not go well, as your response was "what, peasant? I don't care, that's my patch take it or leave it." It doesn't surprise me that your patch was "missed" or ignored.

I can tell you from experience before we used github, development on D was so freaking slow, you would be complaining to no end if it were still that way. The PR system is orders of magnitude better and faster.

If you want patches included quickly (or at least quicker), add them as PRs to github, and be prepared to fix them if necessary. If you think D ecosystem will crash and burn because of your intransigence, you are free to have that opinion, but most of us here do not share it (and you aren't the first to express it). I don't think your contributions are low-value, just high overhead. Most of us don't have time for that.

-Steve

Reply via email to