On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 20:01:59 +0000
Julian Kranz via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:

> Well, of course you're right; but the thing is - does it really 
> make sense to have a less powerful semantic for functions here? 
> Does it help in any way? I mean, if something works just because 
> you're using a template, it should maybe also work if you're 
> not...
see my another reply. internally templates generates functions with
different signatures, 'cause compiler must know the signature to tell
the caller what exactly it is calling. ;-) templates was born to
overcome this limitation. ;-)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to