On Saturday, 31 January 2015 at 01:07:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/30/15 3:49 PM, Foo wrote:
Is there interest in such a thing?
I'm currently working on something for my own use and I'm
curious if
anyone else would be interested in something like that.
I'm aware of Unique, RefCounted, Scoped, emplace and so on,
but I'm not
a big fan of some implementations (in my opinion not much of
it follows
the KISS principle). Also, as far as I remember, RefCounted
and Unique
are somewhat outdated.
As said I'm just curious and I'm aware that my code may be
somewhat
un-phobos like.
My current stand is this: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/f1423322b7d5
Just to make it clear: m3 = manual memory management = mmm = m3
and here is some test code: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/026013fbe19f
I repeat: I know that I reimplement some logic like emplace
and that my
version is shorter but maybe not quite correct/incomplete.
So why come with your own self-admitted incomplete/incorrect
alternatives instead of adding/improving the standard ones? If
something's there that shouldn't, remove it. I don't get this
"I didn't get it so I'll redo it incompletely".
And I'm also aware of std.allocator and so on, but that is
something
different IMO.
Agreed.
Andrei
And I did not literally said 'incorrect'. I said _maybe_
incomplete. In my tests it works properly. What I meant with 'not
quite correct' was that it isn't well tested _yet_. But that can
be done later.
