On Friday, 6 February 2015 at 19:16:13 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
This is precisely why I have lost all interest in @safe. It's
clear that
the present problematic situation will continue to hold, and
the
decision makers are not interested to address it. I am not
going to
waste any more time and energy on this topic.
I've asked repeatedly for evidence of the "problematic
situation", and all I got was doomsday predictions "maintenance
nightmare!". If you have such, please show it. If not, thanks
for a good course of action. -- Andrei
The best evidence I have it that everyone who actually worked on
the phobos code you disapprove of says it's a problem. Argumentum
ad populem, I know, but it calls for close scrutiny, to say the
least.
My attitude is not based on evidence. It's based on just thinking
about the problem:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/eeglnychgudcffpjc...@forum.dlang.org
I really can't answer this question.
