On 2/23/2015 12:33 AM, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
On Monday, 23 February 2015 at 08:27:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:Thanks to the messed up modular arithmetics that D has chosen you cannot assume the a non-shared live object does not have a rc==0 due to wrapping integers, in the general case.You mean when there are more than 2^64 references to the object?
Yeah, it'll wrap when there are more references than can even theoretically fit in the address space.
I'm not worried about it :-)