On Monday, 23 February 2015 at 08:50:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/23/2015 12:33 AM, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
On Monday, 23 February 2015 at 08:27:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
Thanks to the messed up modular arithmetics that D has chosen
you cannot
assume the a non-shared live object does not have a rc==0 due
to wrapping
integers, in the general case.
You mean when there are more than 2^64 references to the
object?
Yeah, it'll wrap when there are more references than can even
theoretically fit in the address space.
I'm not worried about it :-)
You don't worry about a lot of things that you ought to worry
about :-P