On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 08:16:37 +0000, Kagamin wrote: > On Thursday, 5 March 2015 at 05:17:44 UTC, ketmar wrote: >> as for me, it's also very hard to decide what scope of GUI library >> should be. i.e. is this library just for me, so i can expose internals >> and simply add the comment "don't change this thing" to the code? > > You mean access to the backend primitives?
nope. i mean access to widget object's internals. >> is this a simple library with limited set of controls, or i want it to >> be infinitely extendable? > > Provide a minimal set of controls and extended one in a separate > library. Should be doable, I see no reason to fix the control set. the reason is that with fixed set i can greatly simplify library code.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature