On Friday, 13 March 2015 at 10:34:32 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Ola Fosheim Grøstad:
Yes, but what is a "strict mode". I agree with most of what is
said about D and Go in the top post, but is there a market for
yet another high level language that isn't high level enough?
"Strict mode" is a D2 with immutable+@safe+pure by default,
something like a "var" keyword to denote mutable values, no
comma operator, static full tracking of memory ownership, less
implicit casts (because now we have the safe int(x) sytnax),
and few other small changes that make the language less bug
prone and more strict.
And I'd still like built-in tuple syntax in D.
Bye,
bearophile
That actually sounds quite nice, but I wonder if this is just
hopeful wishing or something D would actively move towards.
