On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 09:15:01PM +0000, weaselcat via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 20:56:09 UTC, deadalnix wrote: > >On Friday, 3 April 2015 at 19:45:29 UTC, weaselcat wrote: > >>The reliance on GDC/LDC to produce production-level binaries(i.e, > >>optimized) and the actual people working on them really is > >>worrisome. If Iain or Kai decided one day to leave D, it would be a > >>very big blow I think. > > > >Yes. And considering there is no hope that we bring dmd's backend up > >to speed with GCC or LLVM (let's be realistic one second) what is > >even more worrisome is how little they are integrated in the > >workflow. > > Out of curiosity, what was the communication level between the > decision to switch to ddmd frontend and the ldc/gdc team?
I thought it was public knowledge for a while now that eventually we're gonna do this switch? It was just a matter of time. I mean, Daniel Murphy hasn't exactly been keeping hush-hush about progress on ddmd all this time. T -- Give me some fresh salted fish, please.