On 4/8/15 7:00 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 April 2015 at 13:52:22 UTC, bearophile wrote:
deadalnix:

foreach (name; names.parallel) {
  name.writeln;
}

no.please

I think "foo.writeln;" is acceptable. You just need to get a bit used
to it.

Bye,
bearophile

No.

Ja, ja, ja. -- Andrei

Reply via email to