On 4/28/2015 4:13 PM, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 April 2015 at 02:24:02 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Interesting read, and the conclusion beg the question: why using a sublanguage
for const expression, if it do not provides the guarantee it is supposed to.

http://b.atch.se/posts/non-constant-constant-expressions/

If someone discovers similar hole in D - please, I beg you, don't try building a
library on top of it. Report a bug instead :)

Yes, many times, yes. Report it to bugzilla as a bug. Any code relying on buggy behavior listed in bugzilla is likely to get little sympathy from the D community when it breaks due to a bugfix.

Reply via email to