"Vladimir Panteleev" wrote in message
news:ajrysqkjmlqjlmkip...@forum.dlang.org...
On Wednesday, 29 April 2015 at 19:15:46 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> but std.allocator is definitely not your average code
OK, I'm tired of hearing this argument.
It's valid though. Most array code cares more about the contents than the
address, while std.allocator only cares about the address.
Here's the results against my ae library:
...
I didn't examine every single one, but the first dozen are all
false positives.
Yeah, looks like you're intentionally checking for null rather than empty.
It sucks that so many places need updating.
Oh, and note the few that occur in Phobos templates (with no
instantiation trace). I'll have fun tracking those down!
Is that from string lambdas? Does it give an instantiation trace when you
use it with warning as errors?
