On Tuesday, 5 May 2015 at 17:07:19 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 May 2015 at 16:05:16 UTC, ponce wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 May 2015 at 12:43:38 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
On 6/05/2015 12:37 a.m., ponce wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 May 2015 at 12:04:39 UTC, Alex Ogheri wrote:
Hi guys, did you know this ??
http://vlang.org/
In fact, it gathered quite an enthusiastic appreciation at
dvcon in
Munich!!
Paper: http://vlang.org/dvcon2014.pdf
I'd say that's pretty huge!
http://proceedings.dvcon-europe.org/2014/presentations_and_papers/T5_5_presentation.pdf
It's amazing when you think there was such a push-back against
UDAs when they were introduced, and here they are, being
incredibly useful in all sorts of description task.
There was pushback on ADU, there was pushback on the way they
are specified, and considering half the doc about UDA is
antipattern, there is hard data to show that this pushback was
justified.
ADU as in Attribute Defined User, obviously :/
