On Wednesday, 6 May 2015 at 17:01:05 UTC, Luís Marques wrote:
That's sounds like a great story! What kind of "values" were you caching?
Without going into the details, we had entries in a DB, counting in the millions in the working set. Some of them where hammered heavily, most of them were only needed an handful of time. Problem is, there was no way upfront to know which ones, so we add there entries in a local cache, so we can find the heavily used ones in the cache, and fallback on the DB for the less commonly used ones.
