On Thu, 14 May 2015 02:56:46 -0400, Namespace <rswhi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 14 May 2015 at 00:12:05 UTC, bitwise wrote:
Side note: DIP36 seems to be missing the table with the authors,
status, etc.
Bit
Huh, DIP36? DIP36 was rejected, but the authors (me and Dicebot) are
below.
Hmm.. so they are ;)
I've heard that DIP69 is [quote]almost dead in favor of DIP25[/quote].
That's why I'm a bit confused and would like to know the scheme, if any.
:)
Makes sense, but if scope is dead, I assume it would have to be removed at
some point.
So I guess 'ref' could just take rvalues now that it's escape-proof right?
Also, what becomes of the 'in' storage class? being just another word for
'const' seems like a waste.
If it were up to me, I would say:
'scope' should be removed as a storage class,
'ref' should be left as is, and
'in' should adopt the behavior of 'ref' post DIP25
Bit
