On Thu, 14 May 2015 13:15:34 -0400, Namespace <rswhi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 14 May 2015 at 16:53:04 UTC, bitwise wrote:
If it were up to me, I would say:
'scope' should be removed as a storage class,
'ref' should be left as is, and
'in' should adopt the behavior of 'ref' post DIP25
Bit
As Andrei said several times (recently here:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/scaufixfdyyrbmijg...@forum.dlang.org?page=3#post-mit5lp:241kpt:241:40digitalmars.com)
auto ref will take care about rvalue references. I've only hoped that I
could get a schedule for that or at least a confirmation. :)
If I understand Andrei's response correctly though, you will still have to
use 'auto ref' to get ref to bind to rvalues.. no?
So if I'm right about the above, and scope is out, why not just use 'in'
instead of 'auto ref'?
Bit
