On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 02:14:46 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 00:53:35 +0000, weaselcat wrote:you're aware that the dmd backend is proprietary, right?of course. that's why i never submitted any fixes to DMD backend,although i have some.
was just making surewhile I agree with your ideological standpoint on GPL, gcc is virtually inaccessible to anyone who isn't already familiar with the codebase in comparison to llvm. At least it seems gcc is interested in changing this.
