On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 02:40:55 +0200, Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On 06/03/15 01:41, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: >> On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 18:49:09 +0200, Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d >> wrote: >> >>> On 06/02/15 14:21, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: >>>> this opens a can of worms. should this be accepted too: >>>> enum doItFinal = false; >>>> final(doItFinal) >>>> ? >>>> >>>> or even >>>> final(someFunnyTemplate!(with_, args, andOtherTemplate!"too")) >>>> ? > >>> Of course. >> >> this is bad. it smells. it adds almost nothing in terms of uniformity. >> and i'm sure that Hackerpilot will be happy to know that he now needs a >> full-blown D interpreter to determine if some method is virtual or not. >> ;-) > > An interpreter is required anyway.
and the idea is still bad.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
