On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 10:46:27 +0000, weaselcat wrote: > On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 10:16:18 UTC, ketmar wrote: >> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 08:58:12 +0000, weaselcat wrote: >> >>> On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 08:52:26 UTC, Dicebot wrote: >>>> On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 18:50:33 UTC, weaselcat wrote: >>>>> Yes, and it's an obvious issue. Some of the most frequently >>>>> requested things are real tuple syntax, pattern matching, etc. >>>>> Short of getting these into D itself(good luck,) any attempt at >>>>> these will end up being an ugly hack. >>>> >>>> This is neither obvious issue, not a good solution. >>>> >>>> The fact that no one will implement custom pattern matching until it >>>> comes into language officially is a Good Thing (TM). >>> >>> If you say so, nearly every reddit thread about D a top voted comment >>> is about the lack of a real preprocessor/AST macros. >> >> reddit herd are mostly monkeys which didn't even know D enough. > > avoid success at all costs
i honestly want reddit to be burnt. the only "good" thing i've seen from that is "no, we don't follow #breakourcode, as some reddit retard that doesn't even using D will complain about that!"
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
