On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 10:16:18 UTC, ketmar wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 08:58:12 +0000, weaselcat wrote:
On Sunday, 14 June 2015 at 08:52:26 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Saturday, 13 June 2015 at 18:50:33 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
Yes, and it's an obvious issue. Some of the most frequently
requested
things are real tuple syntax, pattern matching, etc.
Short of getting these into D itself(good luck,) any attempt
at these
will end up being an ugly hack.
This is neither obvious issue, not a good solution.
The fact that no one will implement custom pattern matching
until it
comes into language officially is a Good Thing (TM).
If you say so, nearly every reddit thread about D a top voted
comment is
about the lack of a real preprocessor/AST macros.
reddit herd are mostly monkeys which didn't even know D enough.
avoid success at all costs
