On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 16:36:21 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 at 16:18:01 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Although I wouldn't put too much reliance on X, what with
Wayland on the way.
meh, wayland doesn't look very interesting to me, especially in
this use case where I'd want a network protocol because the
application runs on an isolated VM and needs to communicate
with the host somehow.
I'm not sure of your use case, but wayland is clearly a huge step
forward compared to X. Take it from someone that have messed up
with both.
